![]() ![]() it is borderline useless sadly on medium and smaller ships unless you have lots of shield, lots of spare armor, and lots of hull (a gunship for example or a bomber with its insane hull renegeration) you need to take a fair bit of damage to hurt an enemy. This sounds pretty good on paper.until you factor in enemies are about on par with a normal ship builds in terms of hull and armor. i will go through them and talk about problems with each.įor 18 seconds, deal all damage with a 50% increase to the target. The quantum entangler has 4 modes (including base mode). When researchers study entanglement, they often use a special kind of crystal to generate two entangled particles from one.The idea of taking damage and dealing damage by taking damage is pretty cool.but the quantum entangler is too weak to be of any use towards any enemies exept drones.which are already weak. The entangled particles are then sent off to different locations. For this example, let's say the researchers want to measure the direction the particles are spinning, which can be either up or down along a given axis. Before the particles are measured, each will be in a state of superposition, or both "spin up" and "spin down" at the same time. If the researcher measures the direction of one particle's spin and then repeats the measurement on its distant, entangled partner, that researcher will always find that the pair are correlated: if one particle's spin is up, the other's will be down (the spins may instead both be up or both be down, depending on how the experiment is designed, but there will always be a correlation). Returning to our dancer metaphor, this would be like observing one dancer and finding them in a pirouette, and then automatically knowing the other dancer must also be performing a pirouette. The beauty of entanglement is that just knowing the state of one particle automatically tells you something about its companion, even when they are far apart. Are particles really connected across space?īut are the particles really somehow tethered to each other across space, or is something else going on? Some scientists, including Albert Einstein in the 1930s, pointed out that the entangled particles might have always been spin up or spin down, but that this information was hidden from us until the measurements were made. Such "local hidden variable theories" argued against the mind-boggling aspect of entanglement, instead proposing that something more mundane, yet unseen, is going on. Thanks to theoretical work by John Stewart Bell in the 1960s, and experimental work done by Caltech alumnus John Clauser (BS '64) and others beginning in the 1970s, scientists have ruled out these local hidden-variable theories. ![]() A key to the researchers' success involved observing entangled particles from different angles. ![]() ![]() In the experiment mentioned above, this means that a researcher would measure their first particle as spin up, but then use a different viewing angle (or a different spin axis direction) to measure the second particle. Rather than the two particles matching up as before, the second particle would have gone back into a state of superposition and, once observed, could be either spin up or down. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |